Activists say Israeli settlers assaulted them in the occupied West Bank, as Israel's High Court presses the state over a settler attack
Activists and Palestinian olive harvesters say Israeli settlers attacked them in several parts of the occupied West Bank. At Israel's High Court the state acknowledged 'shame and failure' over a Palestinian family in Jalud whose homes burned despite a protection order.
Left 1 · Centre-left 1 · Centre 0 · Centre-right 1 · Right 0
ContextSources by leanVideoDeep diveFollow the moneyMore coverage
How each side framed it
Left-leaning outlets
Ongoing violence: 'Settlers attack olive pickers as IDF conducts raids, expels farmers' (Haaretz); activists 'accuse Israeli settlers of assault' (Al Jazeera).
Centre outlets
No least-biased (centre) outlet in our sample covered it.
Right-leaning outlets
The state answers in court: Israel's High Court 'presses state over settler attack on Palestinian family' (Jerusalem Post).
Context
We write the background for the day's biggest stories; for this one, start with these searches. How it works.
Search for more (live results, not checked by us): Wikipedia search · Explainers (Google News search) · Background and history (Google News search)
Sources by lean
Balanced: the same number of articles from the left, the centre and the right (up to 3 each). The bar above still counts every rated outlet we found. Bias and factual ratings come from Media Bias/Fact Check. How we balance · All ratings.
Left 1
Centre 0
No centre coverage found — blindspot
Right 1
Showing 1 from left and right of 3 rated outlets (L 2 / C 0 / R 1). Capped at 1 because that is all we found on the thinnest side. More coverage
Video
News reports, explainers and podcasts on YouTube. We pick and balance videos for the day's biggest stories; for this one, use these searches. Links open YouTube, which has its own privacy policy; nothing from YouTube loads on this page.
YouTube searches (live results, not checked or balanced by us): News videos · Explainers · Podcasts
Deep dive
A short prompt for thinking it through. We write a fuller side-by-side deep dive for the day's biggest stories.
The paradox: A state can admit failure in court while the attacks continue in the fields.
What each side may be protecting: Left: Palestinian lives and land. Right: the rule of law and Israel's own institutions.
A question to hold: What enforcement would satisfy the court's order on the ground?
Try it: open one left and one right article in Sources by lean and note what each takes for granted.
Follow the money
Not yet researched. We haven't yet looked at who gains or loses financially from this story, or who funds the main voices on each side. When we do, we check company filings, the Electoral Commission donations register, lobbying registers, annual reports, InfluenceMap and OpenSecrets, and we apply the same checks to every side. How we follow the money.
Who owns or funds the outlets covering this story (3 outlets)
| Outlet | Lean | Ownership & funding (MBFC) |
|---|---|---|
| Haaretz | Left | According to the Financial Times, Haaretz does not report its earnings. They were also the first Israeli paper to introduce the paywall. For subscription fees, please see here. source |
| Al Jazeera | Centre-left | Al Jazeera is owned and funded by the state of Qatar. The founder and Chairman of the Board is Sheikh Hamad bin Thamer Al Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family, the House of Thani. According to a Fortune article, i n 2016, state-funded broadcaster Al Jazeera laid off 500 workers due to Qatar’s financial troubles resulting from low global prices for oil and natural gas. source |
| Jerusalem Post | Centre-right | In 1989, the paper was purchased by Hollinger Inc. for $17-million, which Canadian-born British Conservative Conrad Black owned. Conrad Black later was charged with “swindling his company, Hollinger International, of $60 million.” He was serving a prison sentence; however, in 2019, President Donald Trump pardoned him. source |