A report says the super-rich gain a 'double dividend' from both causing and profiting from the climate crisis
An Oxfam study says the richest 0.1% profit both from polluting industries and from disaster preparedness, recovery and reconstruction, a market projected to grow from $70bn to $92bn a year by 2029. Oxfam calls this a 'double dividend' and argues it gives the wealthiest an incentive to delay climate action.
Left 0 · Centre-left 2 · Centre 0 · Centre-right 0 · Right 0
ContextSources by leanVideoDeep diveFollow the moneyMore coverage
How each side framed it
Left-leaning outlets
Left-rated outlets headline it: “Super-rich get ‘double dividend’ from causes and costs of climate crisis, report finds” (The Guardian); “The Carbon Footprint of the Ultrarich” (Time).
Centre outlets
No least-biased (centre) outlet in our sample covered it.
Right-leaning outlets
No right-rated outlet in our sample covered it.
Context
We write the background for the day's biggest stories; for this one, start with these searches. How it works.
Search for more (live results, not checked by us): Wikipedia search · Explainers (Google News search) · Background and history (Google News search)
Sources by lean
Balanced: the same number of articles from the left, the centre and the right (up to 3 each). The bar above still counts every rated outlet we found. Bias and factual ratings come from Media Bias/Fact Check. How we balance · All ratings.
Left 2
Centre 0
No centre coverage found — blindspot
Right 0
No right coverage found — blindspot
Showing 2 from left of 2 rated outlets (L 2 / C 0 / R 0). Capped at 2 because that is all we found on the thinnest side. More coverage
Video
News reports, explainers and podcasts on YouTube. We pick and balance videos for the day's biggest stories; for this one, use these searches. Links open YouTube, which has its own privacy policy; nothing from YouTube loads on this page.
YouTube searches (live results, not checked or balanced by us): News videos · Explainers · Podcasts
Deep dive
A short prompt for thinking it through. We write a fuller side-by-side deep dive for the day's biggest stories.
A question to hold: What would each side need to see to change its mind?
Try it: open one left and one right article in Sources by lean and note what each takes for granted.
Follow the money
Not yet researched. We haven't yet looked at who gains or loses financially from this story, or who funds the main voices on each side. When we do, we check company filings, the Electoral Commission donations register, lobbying registers, annual reports, InfluenceMap and OpenSecrets, and we apply the same checks to every side. How we follow the money.
Who owns or funds the outlets covering this story (2 outlets)
| Outlet | Lean | Ownership & funding (MBFC) |
|---|---|---|
| The Guardian | Centre-left | The Guardian and its companion publication, the Sunday newspaper The Observer, are owned by Guardian Media Group plc (GMG). Scott Trust Limited was created in 1936 to ensure the editorial independence of the publications and owns Guardian Media Group plc (GMG). source |
| Time | Centre-left | Time Magazine is owned by Marc and Lynne Benioff and is funded through subscriptions, sponsored content, and advertising sales. source |